loader

Phone: +233 24 467 4591 / +233 53 129 4891

Shopping Cart ( 0 )

Your Have 0 Item In Your Cart

close

No products in the cart.

Author: admin_dev

18May 2022

Agilent in Genomics

We are entering an exciting era in the advancement of human health. New technologies and a greater understanding of disease are driving a revolution in precision medicine. Physicians are able to identify and treat maladies earlier, more effectively and at a lower cost.

Agilent is at the forefront of this effort, equipping researchers and medical professionals to better understand, diagnose and treat diseases. One key area where we contribute is in genomics. While genetics studies individual genes, genomicsstudies all parts of an organism’s genes. By analyzing the entire human genome (our entire DNA content), scientists can better understand the cause of a disease.

  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables scientists to “sequence” (map) an entire genome quickly and inexpensively. Agilent offers solutions for both Amplicon-based targeted NGS and Hybridization-based targeted NGS. Agilent’s Alissa Clinical Informatics Platform delivers data analysis and interpretation of NGS and CGH data.
  • Electrophoresis is used to separate DNA, RNA and protein molecules. Agilent’s Bioanalyzer Automated Electrophoresisprovide sizing, quantitation and purity assessments for DNA, RNA and protein samples. Agilent’s TapeStation Automated Electrophoresis provides automated sample processing for quick and reliable sample quality control for any NGS workflow.
  • Microarrays are collections of DNA “spots” attached to a solid surface. Researchers use them to detect copy number changes on a genome scale, study how various genes are “expressed” (turned on and off) or regulated in cells, or study how proteins and DNA interact. Agilent has microarray platforms for CGH (comparative genomic hybridization), CGH+SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms), Gene ExpressionmiRNA and Epigenetic and Specialty Microarrays. Agilent also offers CGH diagnostic testing with its GenetiSure Dx Postnatal Assay*enabling clinicians to make informed decisions with a complete diagnostic microarray platform for postnatal analysis.
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) can take a small sample of DNA and generate millions of copies for research and analysis. Agilent’s PCR products offer a full portfolio of products that help you obtain quality results more rapidly. Agilent’s portfolio also includes Real-Time PCR (qPCR)system that includes the newest generation AriaMx and AriaDx (IVD) system.
  • Agilent’s Oligo Library Synthesis (OLS) technology has been driving scientific innovation through collaborative research with many of the world’s leading non-profit and academic institutions. OLS allows Agilent to synthesize the highest fidelity, longest oligos in the industry, and we are now applying this technology to make CRISPR/Cas9.
  • Agilent’s Mutagenesis and Cloning portfolio include the fastest and latest generation kits, competent cells, vectors, and enzymes for molecular biology research for any downstream applications.
  • Protein Expression solutions from Agilent include a comprehensive line of competent cells, vectors, antibodies, antibiotics, transfection reagents, and specialty kits for protein expression and purification applications.
  • Automation of liquid handling protocols provides higher accuracy and reduces hands-on time, both of which are critical to genomics applications. Agilent has automation solution like the Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platformto address this need.

Agilent recently launched a major website update for our Genomics portfolio. Customers can benefit from a better and integrated information experience and easily navigate to industry-leading products and solutions.

*For In Vitro Diagnostic Use

18May 2022

A Key to Disease Research: Post-Translational Modifications

Scientists who study diseases are increasingly looking at post-translational modifications in proteins.

What are these?  Let’s take a step back and define some terms.

Proteins are large biomolecules made from chains of amino acids.  Proteins perform a variety of functions in your body: they transport other molecules around, and they manage your DNA replication.

(Just as genomics is the study of your genomeproteomics is the study of your proteins.)

A protein’s specific function is determined by its structure.  And a protein changes its structure through post-translational modification.  PTMs occur when enzymes trigger chemical changes.

What does this have to do with disease?  When a pathogen attacks your body’s cells, it will often hijack the enzymes behind PTMs, which can degrade your proteins.  The HIV virusis an example of this.

“Protein PTMs are emerging as important biomarkers for disease states, such as heart diseasecancerdiabetes and neurological disorders,” says Agilent’s Shweta Shukradas.

Scientists who study proteins and PTMs require extremely sophisticated analytical techniques to study these cellular-level signals.

“Dynamic range and sensitivity pose a critical challenge to the accurate quantitation of PTMs,” Shweta says.  “Proteins span a wide range of concentrations as they are naturally expressed.”

Agilent offers a variety of comprehensive workflow solutions for proteomics, from identification and characterization of PTMs to biomarker discovery and quantitation.

Discovery proteomics involves the identification of proteins without any prior knowledge of what they may be.  Agilent’s solution includes an Agilent LC/Q-TOFMassHunter softwareand Spectrum Mill software.

Targeted proteomics involves the confirmation of proteins based on prior knowledge.  Agilent’s solution includes an Agilent LC/QQQMassHunter software, and Spectrum Mill and Skyline software.

18May 2022

COVID-19: COA FS Could Be An Effective Cure—Dr Smauel Ato Duncan

As the scientific community scrambles to find a drug that can effectively treat patients sickened by a new respiratory virus, coronavirus (COVID-19), the Executive President, Centre Of Awareness Global Peace Mission (COA), Prof. Dr. Samuel Ato Duncan has called on the Government, World Health Organization (WHO) to collaborate with the COA, University of Ghana, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research to conduct research on the COA FS to ascertain its effectiveness against Coronavirus clinically.

He believed and hope that there will be positive results from the trials. And when that happens, both party’s can adopt the formula and the products as the antidote to Coronavirus.

Speaking at a press conference on Monday in Accra, Professor Samuel Ato Duncan, disclosed that they sent some of the COA products to China about two weeks ago to try on Coronavirus patients.

However, the result indicated that there has been a significant improvement in the condition of some infected patients who were given COA products.

He made known that even though it is good news but to him, it is not scientific hence not conclusive.

According to him, the human body is designed to heal itself if it only can allow it to do so. However, he said the Coronavirus is not an exception to this. Augmenting the immune system is key to the elimination of this virus.

The Center for Awareness Global Peace Mission has for the past (15) years developed and organic antiviral medicine that has three-dimensional effects to combat video spectrum of viral infections and has qualified for clinical trials in Ghana.

The research which started in 2005 has cost the Center of Awareness over Twenty million US dollars without support from any donor agency or any government.

The three (3) dimensional effects of COA herbal medicine which include, Oral Administration, Intramuscular Administration, and Intravenous Administration.

These three ways of administration can eliminate viruses from the human body initiating cure. The COA believes that it could be the solution to Coronavirus infections.

Prof. Ato Duncan, Address pointed that on 31st December 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, reported a cluster of 27 pneumonia cases of unknown origin, including seven severe, with a commonly reported link to Wuhan’s Huanan seafood wholesale market ( a wholesale fish and live animal market selling different animal species).

He said on 1st January 2020. According to the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, samples from the market tested positive for the novel Coronavirus.

COA FS is brewed and distilled at high temperatures, hence its unique colorless feature. The also supports the immune system which has not been compromised to resist attack from foreign and damaging organisms like viruses bacteria and parasites.

As of today’s reports, the global number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 has surpassed 110,029 with 3,817 deaths in more than 105 countries.

18May 2022

Excitement around hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19

Abstract

Aim:

Chloroquine is an antimalarial drug used in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Three methods to quantify chloroquine and its metabolite in blood matrices were developed and validated.

Methodology & results:

Different high-throughput extraction techniques were used to recover the drugs from whole blood (50 μl), plasma (100 μl) and dried blood spots (15 μl as punched discs) followed by quantification with LC-MS/MS. The intra- and inter-batch precisions were below 15% and thus meet regulatory acceptance criteria.

Conclusion:

The developed methods demonstrated satisfactory validation performance with high sensitivity and selectivity. The assays used simple and easy to automate extraction techniques. All methods were reliable with robust performance and demonstrated to be suitable to implement into a high-throughput routine analysis of clinical pharmacokinetic samples.

Keywords: : chloroquine, dried blood spots, human blood, LC-MS/MS, malaria, method validation

Malaria is still a major public health problem worldwide, resulting in an estimated 445,000 annual deaths in 2016. Chloroquine was once the most extensively used antimalarial drug, due to its low cost, high efficacy and relative safety. It was later discontinued for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infections in most countries worldwide due to increasing drug resistance. However, it has been reported that a prolonged absence of chloroquine in endemic areas can lead to a reversal of resistance in the parasite population, providing a renewed potential to treat P. falciparum infections. Chloroquine is still the main first-line therapy recommended for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax infections. However, chloroquine resistance has been reported in P. vivax in Brazil, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Malaysia (Borneo), Myanmar, Thailand, Papua New Guinea and Peru. Chloroquine belongs to the 4-aminoquinoline group of antimalarial drugs. The major active metabolite of chloroquine, generated by CYP450 CYP2C8 and CYP3A4/5 enzymes, is desethylchloroquine. Both chloroquine and desethylchloroquine are slowly eliminated, with a terminal elimination half-life of approximately 30–60 days. They are mainly bound to platelets, erythrocytes, thrombocytes and granulocytes, similar to other quinoline antimalarial drugs, resulting in increased concentrations in infected or uninfected blood cells that are about two- to five-times higher than what can be found in plasma. Figure 1 shows the molecular structure of chloroquine and desethylchloroquine.

Figure 1.
Molecular structure of chloroquine and desethylchloroquine.

Several quantification methods of chloroquine in biological matrices have been described previously. Early publications of bioanalytical methods commonly used extraction procedures, such as protein precipitation and liquid–liquid extraction, which often leave protein residues in the extracted sample. Liquid–liquid extraction is also labor intensive and time consuming. A separation and detection method consisting of LC coupled with UV or fluorescence detection are easy to operate but provide only low sensitivity and selectivity, and often require large sample volumes to achieve adequate sensitivity for quantification of clinical pharmacokinetic samples. A recent publication with diode array detector used a more powerful sample extraction technique (e.g., SPE). However, this method still proved less sensitive (LLOQ of 10 ng/ml) using a large injection volume (50 μl) for improved sensitivity. The introduction of mass spectrometric detection has become popular for its high sensitivity and selectivity that is useful for pharmacokinetic studies. Several mass spectrometric methods have been published for chloroquine determination, but those were simultaneous analysis with other antimalarial drugs. Simultaneous analysis often leads to compromises, for example, a general extraction method needs to be used that can lead to severe matrix effects. A large injection volume to improve sensitivity and prolonged analysis time, for example, 19–21 min/sample due to added chromatography column washout period, to reduce memory effects or sample carryover, were some of the compromises met.

Here we present an optimized protocol for the quantification of chloroquine and its metabolite, desethylchloroquine, in plasma, whole blood and dried blood spots (DBS) using LC–MS/MS. Three different extraction techniques were used to ensure high-throughput and optimal recoveries of the drugs from the different biological matrices. The use of MS for the detection of the drug molecules provides higher sensitivity, selectivity, and requires smaller sample volumes. The methods described here were developed and optimized for implementation in high-throughput routine settings and were validated in accordance to the Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation (US FDA, 2001)  and the Guidance on Bioanalytical Method Validation (European Medicines Agency, London, UK, 2012).

 

Materials & methods

Chemicals & reagents

Chloroquine and desethylchloroquine were obtained from AlsaChim (Illkirch, France). The stable isotope-labeled internal standards, chloroquine-D4-diphosphate salt and desethylchloroquine-D4, were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (TX, USA). All solvents and chemicals were of MS grade, except ethyl acetate, which was HPLC grade, and ammonia solution (25%), which was analytical grade. Water, acetonitrile, methanol and ethyl acetate were obtained from JT Baker (NJ, USA). Formic acid (98–100%) and ammonium formate were obtained from Fluka (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Ammonia solution (25%) was used to prepare ammonium hydroxide 0.5 M (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Blank whole blood and plasma were obtained from Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand with citrate phosphate dextrose as anticoagulant. For other anticoagulants, EDTA, fluoride-oxalate, fluoride-heparin, Na-heparin and Li-heparin were collected from healthy volunteers at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand. Ethical approval for the method development and validation was sought from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand (certificate no. MUTM 2017-014-01 and approval no. TMEC 16–095).

Equipment

The following SPE columns were used for sample extraction: 100 mg, 1 ml, carboxylic acid bonded sorbent (CBA) fixed 96-wellplate (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) for whole blood, Phree Phospholipids Removal 96-wellplate, 8E-S133-TGB (Phenomenex, CA, USA) for DBS and ISOLUTE® SLE+ 96-well plate, 820-0200-P01, IST (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) for plasma. A Freedom Evo 200 platform liquid handler (TECAN, Mannedorf, Switzerland) was used to automate the sample preparation and extraction. A Robotic Punch Instrument (BSD600-Duet Semi-Automated, Queensland, Australia) was used to obtain samples from the DBS. A TurboVap®96 (Biotage) was used to evaporate the eluted sample.

Preparation of standards, working solutions, calibration standards & quality control samples

Stock solutions (1 mg/ml) of chloroquine, desethylchloroquine and their stable isotope-labeled internal standards were prepared in acetonitrile–water (50–50, v/v) containing 0.5% formic acid and stored at -80°C. Working solutions were prepared from the stock solution using acetonitrile–water (50–50, v/v) as dilution solution and then used for the spiking of whole blood, plasma and whole blood for DBS.

Unless otherwise stated, blank blood from healthy volunteers with EDTA as anticoagulant was used. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation of whole blood at 1500–2000 × g for 10 min. Whole blood applied on chromatography filter paper Whatman (31 ET Chr, DMPK-C, 903 Protein saver and 3 MM Chr; Whatman, Buckinghamshire, UK) and an alternative brand, Ahlstrom 226 (PerkinElmer, MA, USA) was used for DBS technique. The calibration curves of chloroquine/desethylchloroquine were 2.56–1220/3.36–1220 ng/ml, 1.41–610/1.41–610 ng/ml and 1.82–1552/2.95–1552 ng/ml in whole blood, plasma and DBS, respectively. The final volume of working solution in blank blood was kept below 5% in all samples.

Extraction procedure

Whole blood, plasma or punched discs of DBS were aliquoted into 96-well plates and processed using an automated liquid handler platform (Freedom Evo 200) as described below.

Whole blood (50 μl) was aliquoted into a 96-wellplate and 100 μl of water containing stable isotope-labeled internal standard (desethylchloroquine-D4 25.8 ng/ml and chloroquine-D4 72.5 ng/ml) was added, followed by 450 μl of ammonium carbonate 20 mM. The plate was mixed on Mixmate (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 1000 r.p.m. for 2 min and centrifuged at 1100 × g for 2 min (i.e., extraction-ready samples). CBA-fixed SPE 96-wellplate cartridges were conditioned with methanol (1 ml) followed by ammonium carbonate 20 mM (1 ml). Each buffer-diluted whole blood sample (200 μl) was loaded onto the conditioned CBA SPE 96-wellplate and subsequently washed with ammonium carbonate 20 mM (1 ml), ammonium carbonate 20 mM–methanol (20–80, v/v; 1 ml) and methanol–water (50–50, v/v; 1 ml). Full vacuum (10-inch Hg) was applied for 40 min to dry the wells and any liquid left on the SPE cartridge tips was removed. The bound fraction was eluted by adding 900 μl of elution solvent (2% formic acid in methanol), followed by evaporation of the eluent at 70°C under nitrogen gas. The dried samples were reconstituted in 800 μl of mobile phase; acetonitrile-ammonium formate 20 mM with 1% formic acid (15/85, v/v).

Plasma (100 μl) was aliquoted into a 96-wellplate and diluted with 350 μl ammonium hydroxide (0.5 M) containing stable isotope-labeled internal standards (48.1 ng/ml of desethylchloroquine-D4 and 22.7 ng/ml of chloroquine-D4). The plate was mixed on a Mixmate at 1000 r.p.m. for 2 min and centrifuged at 1100 × g for 2 min (i.e., extraction-ready samples). The extraction samples (200 μl) were transferred to a supported liquid extraction, SLE+, 96-well plate. Vacuum of 3–4 inch Hg was applied for 30 s to allow the sample to absorb to the cartridge. The bound fraction was eluted with ethyl acetate (800 μl) followed by evaporation of the eluent at 70°C under nitrogen gas. The dried samples were reconstituted in 800 μl of mobile phase; acetonitrile-ammonium formate 20 mM with 1% formic acid (15–85, v/v).

From one DBS of approximately 50 μl, five discs of 3.2 mm in diameter were punched out (equivalent to 15 μl of whole blood) into a 96-wellplate. Acetonitrile-water with 0.5% formic acid (50-50, v/v; 200 μl) containing stable isotope-labeled internal standards (3.4 ng/ml of desethylchloroquine-D4 and 9.6 ng/ml of chloroquine-D4) was added to each sample, and the plate was mixed on a Mixmate at 1000 r.p.m. for 10 min and centrifuged at 1100 × g for 2 min. Acetonitrile (200 μl) was added to each sample and the plate was mixed on a Mixmate at 1000 r.p.m. for 2 min and centrifuged at 1100 × g for 2 min (i.e., extraction-ready samples). The extraction samples (250 μl) were loaded on a Phree Phospholipids Removal 96-wellplate. Vacuum was applied until the entire sample volume passed through the column, and the collected eluate was diluted with 170 μl of water.

Instrumentation & chromatographic conditions

The LC system was an Agilent 1260 infinity system consisting of a binary LC pump, a vacuum degasser, a temperature-controlled microwell plate autosampler set at 4°C and a temperature-controlled column compartment set at 40°C (Agilent technologies, CA, USA). Data acquisition and processing were performed using Analyst 1.6.2 (Sciex, MA, USA). The analytes were separated on a Zorbax SB-CN 50 mm × 4.6 mm, I.D. 3.5 μm (Agilent Technologies), with a precolumn CN AJO-4305 4 mm × 3 mm, I.D. 3.5 μm (Phenomenex), at a flow rate of 700 μl/min. The mobile phase consisted of (A) acetonitrile-ammonium formate 20 mM with 1% formic acid pH approximately 2.6 (15–85, v/v) and (B) methanol–acetonitrile (75–25, v/v). The mobile phase gradient was A: 0–2 min, B: 2.2–3.7 min and A: 3.9–6.5 min (with 0.2 min linear gradient switch), resulting in a total runtime of 6.5 min per sample. The injection volume was 2 μl.

An API 5000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex) with a TurboV ionization source interface, operating in positive ion mode, was used for the MS/MS analysis. Ion spray voltage was set to 5500 V, with a drying temperature at 650°C. The curtain gas was 25 psi and the nebulizer (GS1) and auxiliary (GS2) gases were 60 psi.

Validation procedure

The assays were validated according to the FDA, 2001 and European Medicines Agency, 2012 on bioanalytical method validation.

Accuracy and precision of the methods were determined by analyzing five replicates of samples at the LLOQ and ULOQ, as well as quality control (QC) samples at three concentrations. Four (whole blood and plasma) to six (DBS) independent runs were performed and evaluated. Accuracy was calculated as mean relative error (%) by comparing the measured average concentration at each QC level with the nominal concentration. Precision of the method (within-run, between-run and total-assay variability) was calculated using a single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), and expressed as the coefficient of variation (%). The ability to dilute samples above the ULOQ (i.e., dilution integrity of over the curve samples) was investigated by analyzing five replicates at 2–3 × ULOQ for chloroquine and desethylchloroquine by 1:5 dilutions for whole blood and DBS methods, and 1:10 dilutions for plasma method.

The calibration curve was assessed by analyzing four to six separate runs (the same as accuracy and precision determination). The best performing linear regression model (nonweighted, 1/x-weighted and 1/x2-weighted) was chosen based on the accuracy and precision of back-calculated concentrations of calibration standards and QC samples. Calibration standards and QC samples contributed equally to the selection of regression model by a ranking approach as previously described.

Selectivity was evaluated by analyzing six blank samples from six different donors for each matrix and the chromatograms were evaluated for any signal that potentially could interfere with the drug identification and measurement. Potentially interfering co-administered antimalarial drugs were investigated in a similar way by injecting 2 μl of individual piperaquine, pyronaridine, artesunate, primaquine and carboxyprimaquine at 30 ng/ml. The same experiment was then repeated while performing postcolumn infusion of chloroquine, desethylchloroquine and their stable isotope-labeled internal standards mix solution (20 ng/ml) for any signs of signal enhancement or suppression.

Absolute extraction recovery was determined by comparing the average response of extracted QC samples (five replicates at each level) with that of postextraction spiked blank blood samples at the same nominal concentration as the QC samples.

Matrix effects were investigated for different donors and anticoagulants using postcolumn infusion experiments. Blood from six different donors were collected using EDTA and from one of the donors, different anticoagulants (Na-heparin, Li-heparin, fluoride-heparin, citrate phosphate dextrose and fluoride oxalate) were also collected. All blank blood extracted samples from six different donors and different anticoagulants were investigated for ion suppression or enhancement caused by the matrix.

18May 2022

Analysis of 27 GC-Amenable Pesticides in Cannabis in North America with the 8890/7010

In the United States, Canada, and other regions where medicinal or adult recreational cannabis use has been legalized, regulatory agencies require chemical and biological testing of the products to ensure compliance and safety. The global movement for cannabis legalization drives the demand for cannabis analytical testing methods, including potency determination, trace metals analysis, residual solvents, and terpenes analysis, microbial screening, and quantitation of micotoxins. Of these assays, residual pesticide analysis is particularly challenging due to the very low LOQs required by regulatory entities.

By the beginning of 2020, the list of pesticides regulated by U.S. state legislation and by Health Canada comprised approximately 100 pesticides, with California currently having the largest target list of pesticides tested in recreational cannabis in the U.S.1 Meanwhile, the Canadian target list mandated by Health Canada generally exhibits lower required LOQs than any U.S. state.2 Of all the pesticides currently regulated in the cannabis industry in North America, at least 27 compounds and their isomers present a challenge for electrospray TQ LC/MS.

A well-defined sample preparation procedure3 and state-of-the-art GC4-6 and LC7-10 triple quadrupole mass spectrometry are required to enable success in meeting diverse regulatory requirements. This application note focuses on gas chromatography‑triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (TQ GC/MS) analysis of 27 GC‑amenable pesticides regulated in cannabis in California by the Bureau of Cannabis Control (BCC) and in Canada by Health Canada that commonly stand out as challenging to analyze using electrospray TQ LC/MS. The California and Canadian required limits of quantitation (LOQs) were successfully met for the 27 pesticides. Excellent quantitative accuracy was achieved at action levels established in both California and Canada.

The rest of the pesticides regulated in California and Canada are analyzed at the action level by TQ LC/MS as reported in application notes 5994‑1743EN,7 5994‑0648EN,8 and 5994-0429EN.9

Materials and methods

An Agilent 8890/7010B TQ GC/MS system (Figure 1A) configured to achieve the highest sensitivity and minimize common pitfalls with pesticide analyses in high‑matrix cannabis samples was used. The GC was configured with the 7693 autosampler and 150-position tray, a MultiMode inlet (MMI) operated in cold solvent vent mode. Mid-column backflush was employed using the Agilent Purged Ultimate Union (PUU) installed between two identical 15 m columns. The 8890 pneumatic switching device (PSD) (Figure 1B) supplied helium to the backflush system. The triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was equipped with the High Efficiency Source (HES) operated in electron ionization (EI) mode at 300 °C. Data were acquired in dynamic MRM (dMRM) mode. dMRM optimizes dwell time distributions to accurately identify and quantify large multi-analyte assays. The acquisition method was retention time-locked to match retention times in the Agilent MassHunter Pesticide & Environmental Pollutant MRM Database (P&EP 4) that allowed for seamless development of the acquisition method. The instrument operating parameters are listed in Table 1. Agilent MassHunter Workstation revision 10, including MassHunter Acquisition 10 SR1, MassHunter Qualitative 10, and MassHunter Quantitative 10.1 packages were used in this work.

18May 2022

Charge Variant and Aggregation Analysis of Innovator and Biosimilars of Rituximab

Introduction

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs are one of the fastest-growing biotherapeutics in the pharma market. The majority of mAbs are for the treatment of cancers.1 The investment during the discovery, development, manufacturing, and clinical trials is huge for innovator mAb drugs. As a result, the cost of innovator drug treatment is usually high for patients. Therefore, more affordable generic versions of innovator drugs, called biosimilars, are in high demand. The first biosimilar was approved for the European market in 2006, and the U.S. market opened nine years later after the introduction of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010. The development of biosimilars is gaining traction due to the patent expiry of innovator molecules.

For biosimilars to be approved by regulatory agencies, manufacturers need to demonstrate that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency.2 A critical part in this process is an extensive comparative analytical study to understand the physicochemical similarities between the innovator and biosimilars. Aggregates, truncation, and other modified forms (deamidation, isomerization, and so forth) are product‑related impurities that arise during the manufacturing process or storage. Their presence in the drug negatively impact drug stability, activity, and efficacy. Therefore, they are usually considered CQAs and are closely monitored and tested throughout the manufacturing process.

This Application Note uses two analytical workflows to demonstrate a comparison between two biosimilars of rituximab and their reference innovator in terms of aggregate and charge variant profiles. Rituximab is a well-known biotherapeutic drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, vasculitis, and dermatomyositis. The two biosimilars were obtained from two manufacturers in different geographical locations. Both workflows are based on the 1260 Infinity II bio-inert LC system together with advanced Bio columns and OpenLab CDS. Charge variants were separated on a weak cation exchange (WCX) column, while aggregates were separated on a size exclusion (SEC) column. Figure 1 shows the two workflow details. Good reproducibility on intraday and interday results ensured reliability of the workflows and demonstrated clear similarities or differences between the innovator and biosimilars.

Experimental

Instrumentation

The systems were composed of the following modules:

  • Agilent 1260 Infinity II Bio-inert Pump (G5654A)
  • Agilent 1260 Infinity II Bio-inert Multisampler (G5668A) with sample cooler
  • Agilent 1260 Infinity II Multicolumn Thermostat (G7116A) with bio-inert heat exchanger
  • Agilent 1260 Infinity II Diode Array Detector WR (G7115A) with bio-inert flow cell
  • Agilent 1260 Infinity II Bio-inert MultiDetector Suite (MDS) (G7805A) featuring dual-angle static and DLS detection (G7809A)

Columns

  • Agilent Bio mAb, nonporous, 2.1 × 250 mm, 5 µm HPLC, PEEK (p/n 5190-2411) for charge variants analysis
  • Agilent AdvanceBio SEC 300Å, 7.8 × 300 mm, 2.7 µm (p/n PL1180‑5301) for aggregation analysis.

Software

  • Agilent OpenLab CDS Version 2.3
  • Agilent Buffer Advisor A.01.01 [009]
  • Agilent Bio-SEC Software version A.02.01 Build 9.34851[21]

LC instrument control as well as LC data analysis was carried out using Agilent OpenLab CDS Version 2.3. It provides a smooth user interface with customized and interactive reporting with drag-and-drop template creation. The peak explorer feature of the software was used to compare the results between the innovator and biosimilars.

Chemicals and samples

All solvents used were LC grade. Fresh ultrapure water was obtained from a Milli-Q Integral system equipped with a 0.22 µm membrane point-of-use cartridge (Millipak). Sodium phosphate monobasic, sodium phosphate dibasic, and sodium chloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA. The mAb drugs, including the innovator and two biosimilars, were purchased from a local distributor. Before analysis in the DLS system, the mobile phase was triple filtered through a 0.1 μm hydrophilic PTFE membrane filter (Merck Millipore). Samples were taken from the original container and centrifuged at 13,000 g for two minutes. Supernatant was aliquoted to an LC sample vial for analysis.

13April 2022

A Key to Disease Research: Post-Translational Modifications

Scientists who study diseases are increasingly looking at post-translational modifications in proteins.

What are these?  Let’s take a step back and define some terms.

Proteins are large biomolecules made from chains of amino acids.  Proteins perform a variety of functions in your body: they transport other molecules around, and they manage your DNA replication.

(Just as genomics is the study of your genomeproteomics is the study of your proteins.)

A protein’s specific function is determined by its structure.  And a protein changes its structure through post-translational modification.  PTMs occur when enzymes trigger chemical changes.

What does this have to do with disease?  When a pathogen attacks your body’s cells, it will often hijack the enzymes behind PTMs, which can degrade your proteins.  The HIV virusis an example of this.

“Protein PTMs are emerging as important biomarkers for disease states, such as heart diseasecancerdiabetes and neurological disorders,” says Agilent’s Shweta Shukradas.

Scientists who study proteins and PTMs require extremely sophisticated analytical techniques to study these cellular-level signals.

“Dynamic range and sensitivity pose a critical challenge to the accurate quantitation of PTMs,” Shweta says.  “Proteins span a wide range of concentrations as they are naturally expressed.”

Agilent offers a variety of comprehensive workflow solutions for proteomics, from identification and characterization of PTMs to biomarker discovery and quantitation.

Discovery proteomics involves the identification of proteins without any prior knowledge of what they may be.  Agilent’s solution includes an Agilent LC/Q-TOFMassHunter softwareand Spectrum Mill software.

Targeted proteomics involves the confirmation of proteins based on prior knowledge.  Agilent’s solution includes an Agilent LC/QQQMassHunter software, and Spectrum Mill and Skyline software.

 

13April 2022

TOR set to declare dividend by 2020

Managing Director of the Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) says the company has put in place stringent measures which will start yielding results to the taxpayer from next year.

According to Mr Osei, the woes of the company can be attributed to some legacy debt over the years which caused the inability of the company to declare dividends to the state for almost a decade.

However, after signing a performance contract for 2019 with the State Enterprise Commission, he assured TOR would bounce back in 2020 to pay a dividend.

“The truth of the matter is that we have a lot of legacy issues but we cannot dwell on that, we have to look forward to making some progress and leverage on the assets that we have in order to turn a profit”he noted.

Isaac Osei admitted that though the outlook is positive, it will be difficult for the refinery to generate enough in 2019 to make a profit.

He said, “I do not think we will make a profit in the next year but the following year which is 2020 hopefully when some of the issues we had in the past has been resolved, TOR will be in a much better position to return a profit to shareholders.”

The Tema Oil Refinery is one of the state-owned enterprises hoping to get a strategic investor to turn it around.

Mr Osei believes the current board has the capacity to transform the company into a world-class refinery facility.